The 599-page withdrawal agreement covers the following main areas:  agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community (OJ L 347 of 16.12.2006, p. 1). JO L 29 31.01.19, p. 7-187 The right of British citizens to move freely within the bloc after Brexit – as they currently can – remains in the air and subject to a possible future agreement. This applies to those who wish to retain as many of the UK`s EU benefits as possible. The approval by the British Parliament of the withdrawal agreement was one of the preconditions for the entry into force of its conditions. Without it, the standard legislation was for the United Kingdom to leave the European Union without a deal. On 23 March 2018, EU and UK negotiators reached an agreement on the draft withdrawal agreement allowing the European Council (Article 50) to adopt guidelines for the framework for future eu-UK relations. Preliminary work (considering) in this section of the withdrawal agreement gives the following tone: for example, it is stipulated that the United Kingdom can develop its own new international agreements “provided that these agreements do not enter into force or apply during this (transitional) period.” On 15 January 2019, the House of Commons voted with 230 votes against the Brexit withdrawal agreement the largest vote against the British government in history.
 The government may survived a vote of confidence the next day.  On March 12, 2019, the House of Commons voted 149 votes against the agreement, the fourth-biggest defeat of the government in the history of the House of Commons.  A third vote on the Brexit withdrawal agreement, widely expected on 19 March 2019, was rejected by the House of Commons spokesman on 18 March 2019, on the basis of a parliamentary convention of 2 April 1604, which prevented British governments from forcing the House of Commons to vote several times on a subject already voted on by the House of Commons.    An abbreviated version of the withdrawal agreement, in which the annex political statement had been withdrawn, consisted of the test of “substantial amendments,” so that a third vote was held on 29 March 2019, but was rejected by 58 votes.  The backstop has been described as a kind of insurance policy if future discussions do not lead to a free trade agreement. It would not guarantee physical border infrastructure and would reduce the risk of a return to the divisions that existed before a 1998 peace agreement that ended decades of political violence. However, since this may not be negotiated before the end of the transition period in December 2020, the EU insisted on the establishment of a “backstop” to avoid a hard border until a free trade agreement comes into force. The dispute over what form this backstop was to take prevented the withdrawal agreement from being sealed for so long. The document begins with a brief drafting of the 23 June 2016 timetable, when more than 52% of British public opinion voted to leave the EU by December 2019. I then present the structure of the agreement, with an explanation of the broad content; Highlight the provisions relating to the legal dimension; UK-EU relations; what the UK trade policy agreement and the Irish backstop say; Financial liquidation Governance and the future dimension of the withdrawal agreement. The VA foresees that future foreign policy, defence and security relations will be able to enter into force during the implementation period, reflecting the uniqueness of the EU`s common foreign and security policy and the common security and defence policy in the treaties.
If coordination is required, the UK could be consulted on a case-by-case basis.