As a general rule, the copyright of a work is primarily the property of the creator of the work, but this is not always the case. This determination would hold even if Peter finally worked only a third of the scenes. Their work, which falls within the parameters of the “Common Work” section of copyright law, also has important copyright implications for the final scenario. So if Wendy and Peter had entered into a collaborative agreement in the script before she had even started the script, Wendy could have turned down the offer of the horror films, and Peter would have had to wait to pay his bills. For example, it is easy to assume that if one party did 75 per cent of the work, while the other contributed 25 per cent, the copyright would be divided by the work on 75/25 basis. This is not the case, however, where the work falls within the definition of copyright as “common work.” Learn how to use the copyright icon for your works, z.B. sites, books and photos. Working with others, it is worth having clear agreements on project ownership or intellectual property. When a copyright holder transfers all rights unconditionally (and retains nothing), this is generally referred to as “assignment.” If only a few of the copyrights are transferred, it is a “licence.” An exclusive licence exists when the transferred rights can only be exercised by the licensee (the licensee) and no one else, including the person who issued the licence (the licensee). If the license allows others (including the licensee) to exercise the same rights as those transferred to the license, the license is designated as non-exclusive. Copyright transfers are unique from a point of view.
Authors or their heirs have the right to terminate any transfer of copyright 35 to 40 years after their replacement. The person who composes the collective work (“the collective author”) owns the copyright to the selection and disposition, but the copyright holders of the underlying works retain their rights.