Paragraphs 6.4 to 6.7 introduce a mechanism “that contributes to the reduction of greenhouse gases and supports sustainable development.”  Although there is not yet a concrete name for the mechanism, many parties and observers have informally partnered around the name of the “sustainable development mechanism” or “SDM”.   The MDS is seen as the successor to the Clean Development Mechanism, a flexible mechanism under the Kyoto Protocol that would allow the parties to jointly monitor emissions reductions for their planned national contributions. The Sustainable Development Mechanism sets the framework for the future of the post-Kyoto sustainable development mechanism (2020). [must update] The countries most affected by the effects of climate change will be low-lying nations, particularly vulnerable to sea level rise, and developing countries that do not have the resources to adapt to changes in temperature and precipitation. But prosperous nations like the United States are also increasingly vulnerable. In fact, millions of Americans – especially children, the elderly and the poor – are already suffering from the wrath of climate change. Implementation of the agreement by all Member States will be evaluated every five years, with the first evaluation in 2023. The result will be used as an input for new national contributions from Member States.  The inventory will not be national contributions/achievements, but a collective analysis of what has been achieved and what remains to be done.
In terms of employment, the clean energy sector already employs more than 3 million Americans – about 14 times the number of people employed in the coal, gas, oil and other fossil fuel industries – and has the potential to invest more in energy efficiency, renewable energy and grid upgrades to replace aging coal infrastructure. Implementation of the Clean Power Plan alone could create more than half a million jobs by 2030. Meanwhile, coal jobs are not so “relocated from America” – another Trump assertion – because they are victims of market forces, renewable energy and natural gas prices are falling. While mitigation and adjustment require more climate funding, adjustment has generally received less support and has mobilized fewer private sector actions.  A 2014 OECD report showed that in 2014, only 16% of the world`s financial resources were devoted to adaptation to climate change.  The Paris Agreement called for a balance between climate finance between adaptation and mitigation, highlighting in particular the need to strengthen support for adaptation from the parties most affected by climate change, including least developed countries and small island developing states.